In Andrew
Stanton’s animated Sci-Fi Wall-E, (2008) the restrictions placed upon the
expressions of characters, both human and robotic, demand a regression to the
silent film era in order to aptly communicate character feelings and
“directives.” The mechanical robot
bodies of Wall-E and Eve are limited in both speech in body language due to
their synthetic natures, while humans are limited due to their increase in body
mass and their decrease in bone mass which renders them immobile and nearly
incapable of body language in the slightest.
Furthermore, their interaction with other human beings occurs, until the
climax of the film, solely through a virtual medium (Note that robotic speech
doesn’t occur for the first 22 minutes of the film, and human speech doesn’t
occur for the first 39 minutes).
The film reverts
as result, relying on editing and music to bestow meaning upon the formerly
lifeless forms.
We understand
Wall-E’s pursuit of robot-love because of the editing technique developed in
1920s Soviet Montage films known as the Kuleshov effect. As expressed by Lev Kuleshov in his
discussion “The Principles of Montage” in his film text The Practice of Film Direction, montage developed at a time when
typage, or non-actors, were utilized to accurately portray a character of certain
socioeconomic status visually. Kuleshov
nods to one of the primary functions of montage aiming to enhance the roles of
the inadequate actors:
“Doubtless, the work of such an
accidental actor (not an actor but a type) will be very poor in quality, and it
is here that the role of montage, correcting and adjusting the actor’s job, is
highly significant.”
Montage
intervenes by juxtaposing a set of shots in order to achieve the Kuleshov
effect: giving birth to an idea or feeling by juxtaposing two shots that is not
present in either shot individually. We
learn about Wall-E’s aspirations through his viewing of the film Hello, Dolly! (1969). We are first presented with a shot of Wall-E
observing the film, then shifting to a POV shot of the screen on which Hello, Dolly! is projected. The shots alternates back to Wall-E, and his
eyes are able to express a sense of longing due to their ability to rotate
downwards on their axis to suggest depression.
Returning to the projection, we see the affectionate human characters
holding hands. The shot again comes back
to Wall-E, this time on his hands instead of his face, and he is grasping his
own mechanical hands together in the absence of a robot love interest. By juxtaposing shots in montage style, we are
able to deduce that Wall-E is capable of very human emotions, particularly
love.
Even in opening
scenes that establish the dystopic setting of “trash planet,” the Kuleshov
effect is accomplished, but through music instead of dynamic editing. Despite the depressive, lifeless landscape,
Wall-E movements are interpreted as swift and full of life: he appears excited
to be creating skyscrapers of trash.
Taking into account, however, his lack of effective expression, we
realize that while his body language and movements certainly contribute to the
construction of meaning, it is not without the music that we are able to
discern his character.
The song “Put on
Your Sunday Clothes” from Hello, Dolly! inspires
our reading of Wall-E’s character, providing an uplifting musical number that
is hopeful in discovering a new meaning in life, simultaneously touching upon
motifs of the film:
“Out
there
There's a world outside of Yonkers
Way out there beyond this hick town,
Barnaby
There's a slick town, Barnaby
Out there
Full of shine and full of sparkle
Close your eyes and see it glisten,
Barnaby
Listen, Barnaby...”
Alluding to the
motifs of abandoning and discovering life throughout the film, we see that form
follows function to an extent: Andrew Stanton acts as a necromancer, relying
heavily on a film tradition of the past to bring expressive life to his
formerly inarticulate characters.
“Wall-E is capable of very human emotions, particularly love.”
ReplyDeleteThis is actually something I kinda wanted to get into with my blog but I ended up somewhere else somehow, it’s easy to digress. Anyways, is it that he is capable of human emotions or has he been simply conditioned to love? Maybe it is only through his nightly viewings of "Hello, Dolly!" that he is taught to love from a humanistic perspective. It's this aspect of his character that makes him completely unique with respect to the other robots that only seem live in accordance with their directive. Additionally, we must remember that Eva only falls in love with Wall-E once she learns of the sacrifice that he endured during her hibernation while waiting on the return vessel. Could this notion then suggest that the underlying foundation of love is rooted in self-sacrifice? Isn’t another relationship sparked off later in the film when a girl sacrifices her own personal safety to help another guy? There seems to be a few different things that can be read from this film about love and its implications…
I agree that music was an extremely important factor in helping all the characters show more emotions, but I don't think that the body language of the robots or people was as limited as we think. I believe most people would be able to pick up on Wall-E's feeling or emotions just by looking at his expression. The animators of this film did a fantastic job of giving Eve and Wall-E expressive body language. The viewers can see happiness, anger, disappointment, annoyance ect. when looking at these robots or somewhat featureless humans. I think we take for granted how the slightest look can give away how we feel. In Wall-E we realize how unified certain expressions, body language, and feelings are. The music definitely helps give a certain mood to the scene, but I don't think it is entirely necessary in order to understand the film.
ReplyDelete