Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Letting go in order to get involved?

Alfonso Caurón’s Gravity mirrors the purpose of Sunshine’s thinking machine, again grappling with the concept of life as absurd.  Whereas Sunshine focuses the message through a macro-lens that aims to demonstrate the necessity to perpetuate life in terms of humanity as a whole, Gravity focuses the message through a micro-lens that aims to demonstrate the necessity to perpetuate life in terms of the individual.

Mainstreaming and narrowing the message is accomplished with disorienting effect.  For one, while the film constructs a protagonist that demands empathy, her situation is the furthest thing from relatable.  To put in Momma Schaef’s terms: “I could handle all that flipping around in space…but not the water on Earth.”  Additionally, there is a selfish and simplified shift in attitude when compared to Sunshine: participating in the agonizing absurdity of life is justified because we should simply “enjoy the ride,” because either way we are going to meet our imminent demise.  The conceited meaning of life develops inevitably because the collection of data for the argument is conceited.  Only the life of Dr. Ryan Jones hangs in the balance from the film’s narrative perspective, which is strange considering the global implications of the tragedy that is depicted.

To communicate this concept, Caurón accesses his infatuation with the potent symbolism that pregnancy harbors within its metaphorical (and literal) womb.  Within this film in particular, he manipulates multiple dimensions of the film to create a sense that the protagonist is in the womb and crippled by the anxiety of leaving the womb and being born.  In addition to the reoccurring motif of umbilical cords that keep her connected to the ship, there is one shot in particular that depicts her in fetal position after she safely returns to the ship’s interior: it may as well have been a three-dimensional sonogram.  Safe within the ship’s interior, sounds of the outside world are often distorted and stifled as if the ship was immersed in water. 

The womb, within and without the film, is a cage.  The womb is a medium that simultaneously protects and isolates from the outside world and the womb is a medium that makes one susceptible to internal dangers (in terms of the film: oneself).  What is beyond the womb is foreign and terrifying.  The ships that Jones occupies are all foreign: whenever she establishes communication with “Mother Earth,” it is rendered benign as language barriers arise.  The ships, like life, are dangerously intertwined and complicated: whenever the ship is struck by debris, it sparks a tense chain of events that sends all of the components of the ship spinning due to tangled wires and ropes.

As effective and moving as the film was during my first (and only) viewing, it again had a very disorienting and paradoxical effect.  For the film to work, we must put stake in the character: we must sympathize with the character.  The character denies any responsibility to interact with the world, but we the audience [the world?] are forced to interact with the character and want the character to have the crystalizing moment where she realizes she should interact with us [spoiler alert (because this is the first spoiler?): she has this moment].  In terms of Icarus' tragedy, Dr. Ryan Jones recognizes George Clooney as flying too close to the Sun (metaphorically, not a major spoiler) and sacrificing his life for hers.  She actually mimics his "why not?" approach to life, and he is largely her inspiration to stay alive. 

The operation of the film is an appropriate cadence to this course.  Perhaps not for the whole of the class, but for me anyway.  All things considered, this post would wrap up nicely with a conceited conclusion.  Like I was saying, the reason why this film left something to be desired was because film, like life, cannot be enjoyed simply for the ride itself.  While certainly the aesthetic pleasure of the ride factors itself into the equation when applying the film as a mechanism for thought, the ride itself can’t exist in a vacuum: like the ship, it is dangerously intertwined with the four kinds of meaning.  And sure, ignorance may be bliss, however not only is the unexamined life a life not worth living, but it is conceited and even unethical.

*Cheese alert*

On that note, if I took away one thing from this class, it would be that the unexamined film is a film not worth viewing.


*Drops mic*

No comments:

Post a Comment